Explore the words cloud of the PHILANTHROPIC RULE project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "PHILANTHROPIC RULE" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
WISSENSCHAFTSZENTRUM BERLIN FUR SOZIALFORSCHUNG GGMBH
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Germany [DE] |
Total cost | 159˙460 € |
EC max contribution | 159˙460 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.3.2. (Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility) |
Code Call | H2020-MSCA-IF-2015 |
Funding Scheme | MSCA-IF-EF-RI |
Starting year | 2017 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2017-07-01 to 2019-06-30 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WISSENSCHAFTSZENTRUM BERLIN FUR SOZIALFORSCHUNG GGMBH | DE (BERLIN) | coordinator | 159˙460.00 |
Scholars interested in Global Governance and international authority favour a broadly Weberian idea of legitimacy as the explanation for the stability and effectiveness of international authority. However, I expand here the focus of analysis in order to include additional concepts like “commonality of interests” and “means of domination”, which are crucial for Weber, but absent from the IR literature on international authority. Among the means of domination, knowledge is of particular importance because it distinguishes the rational from the other types of domination, which explains why knowledge, experts, and diplomats have become an increasingly important topic for IR scholars interested in organizations and in authority. The potential consequences of international authority at local level, like resistance and protection, also receive their due consideration. To put it in a nutshell, what this project pretends is to offer a better account of how donor organizations transfer knowledge, money, goods, salaries to local organizations like universities and research centres, purportedly with the intention of making possible for recipients to pursue their educative policies goals and policies. In reality, I submit, these are “means of domination” that foundations and IOs award local actors so that they operate teaching programs and research projects chosen by the patrons or, in other words, in order to move local actors to collaborate in realizing the goals of donors. In empirical terms, the question is to what extent international organizations – UNESCO, ONU – and transnational ones – philanthropic foundations like Rockefeller and Ford – succeed or failed in their efforts to wield influence on academic organizations, more specifically on teaching and research in the social sciences, in Latin America during the post-war years (1945-1973).
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2019 |
Ãlvaro Morcillo Laiz La gran dama : Science Patronage, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Mexican Social Sciences in the 1940s published pages: 829-854, ISSN: 0022-216X, DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x19000336 |
Journal of Latin American Studies 51/4 | 2020-04-01 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "PHILANTHROPIC RULE" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "PHILANTHROPIC RULE" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.