Explore the words cloud of the CONSERVATION project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "CONSERVATION" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
UNIVERSITETET I OSLO
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Norway [NO] |
Total cost | 1˙571˙553 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙571˙553 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2015-CoG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-COG |
Starting year | 2016 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2016-08-01 to 2021-07-31 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UNIVERSITETET I OSLO | NO (OSLO) | coordinator | 1˙571˙553.00 |
The UN’s approach to climate policy is to focus on national emission caps for greenhouse gases. Most of the economic theory on environmental agreements is also studying such a demand-side approach, even though it is well known that such an approach has several flaws, including carbon leakage and the incentive to free ride. Recent theory has suggested that a better approach may be to focus on the supply-side of the equation, rather than the demand-side. While this recent theory is promising, it is only indicative and has several shortcomings that must be analysed. The goal of this project is to investigate in depth how to best use conservation as an environmental policy tool. The project aims at integrating the theory of emissions and pollution with a model of extraction and thus the supply of exhaustible resources in a coherent and dynamic game-theoretic framework. I will apply this framework to analyse negotiations, agreements, and contracts on extraction levels, and how such policies can interact, complement or substitute for agreements focusing on consumption/emissions. It will also be important to develop and apply the tools of political economics to investigate which (second-best) agreement one may expect to be feasible as equilibria of the game. For highly asymmetric settings, where the possessors of the resource are few (such as for tropical forests), side transfers are necessary and contract theory will be the natural analytical tool when searching for the best agreement. However, also standard contract theory needs to be developed further once one recognizes that the “agent” in the principal-agent relationship is an organization or a government, rather than an individual.
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2019 |
G. B. Asheim, T. Fæhn, K. Nyborg, M. Greaker, C. Hagem, B. Harstad, M. O. Hoel, D. Lund, K. E. Rosendahl The case for a supply-side climate treaty published pages: 325-327, ISSN: 0036-8075, DOI: 10.1126/science.aax5011 |
Science 365/6451 | 2019-10-01 |
2019 |
BÃ¥rd Harstad, Francesco Lancia, Alessia Russo Compliance Technology and Self-enforcing Agreements published pages: 1-29, ISSN: 1542-4766, DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvy055 |
Journal of the European Economic Association 17/1 | 2019-06-18 |
2016 |
BÃ¥rd Harstad The market for conservation and other hostages published pages: 124-151, ISSN: 0022-0531, DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2016.07.003 |
Journal of Economic Theory 166 | 2019-06-06 |
2017 |
BÃ¥rd Harstad, Torben K. Mideksa OUP accepted manuscript published pages: 1708-1734, ISSN: 0034-6527, DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdx014 |
Review of Economic Studies Volume 84, Issue 4 | 2019-04-16 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "CONSERVATION" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "CONSERVATION" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.