Explore the words cloud of the FAHMRRR project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "FAHMRRR" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITAET ZU BERLIN
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Germany [DE] |
Project website | https://www.projekte.hu-berlin.de/de/fahmrrr |
Total cost | 1˙154˙438 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙154˙438 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2015-STG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-STG |
Starting year | 2016 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2016-06-01 to 2020-11-30 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITAET ZU BERLIN | DE (BERLIN) | coordinator | 1˙154˙438.00 |
The sentences: “I have written a proposal for the ERC” and “It is for the ERC that I have written a proposal” mean the same, but they have a different focus structure. A focused element like “It is for the ERC” indicates that alternatives are relevant for the interpretation of the utterance. Hence, the sentence expresses, in addition to its literal content, that the proposal is not for the NSF or the German Research Foundation. The alternative set is a theoretical construct from formal semantics, but a number of researchers, myself included, have shown that it is also cognitively real. I propose to further investigate representation, retrieval and recall of an alternative set. First, I will ask the novel question if the decision to focus a phrase activates alternatives in the speaker’s mind. I will explore this with behavioural measures and event-related brain potentials (ERPs). This question brings together two areas of speech production which are rarely considered side by side: conceptualisation and lexical access. Second, I will examine the neural representation of focus alternatives with neuroimaging. While there is convincing evidence for the cognitive reality of focus alternatives, we do not know how this is reflected in the brain. Finally, I will explore individual differences in processing focus information, using large-scale regression analyses. The aim is to understand which abilities enable a human language user to optimally use the focus information provided by the linguistic input. The project’s innovative potential lies both in its questions and in the combination of methods: neuroimaging, ERPs, a range of behavioral measures, and individual differences approaches, which, in combination, will critically advance our understanding of the cognitive and neural basis of processing information structural cues. The findings will be of interest not only to linguists and cognitive scientists, but also to language teachers and people who use language as a tool.
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2019 |
Katharina Spalek, Yulia Oganian The neurocognitive signature of focus alternatives published pages: 98-108, ISSN: 0093-934X, DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.007 |
Brain and Language 194 | 2019-09-04 |
2019 |
Anna-Lisa Ndao, Katharina Spalek What\'s the alternative? Experimental research on the extent of focus alternative sets published pages: 32-44, ISSN: , DOI: 10.15496/publikation-32632 |
Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2018: Experimental Data Drives Linguistic Theory | 2019-08-29 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "FAHMRRR" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "FAHMRRR" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.