Explore the words cloud of the Digital Good project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "Digital Good" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Netherlands [NL] |
Total cost | 1˙323˙473 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙323˙473 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2018-STG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-STG |
Starting year | 2019 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2019-01-01 to 2023-12-31 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT | NL (NIJMEGEN) | coordinator | 1˙323˙473.00 |
In the last three years, every major consumer technology company has moved into the health research domain. We are witnessing a digital disruption of health research, or a “Googlization of health research” (GHR). This project will be the first wide-ranging, interdisciplinary study of GHR. Its aim is to develop a normative framework for personal health data governance in this setting, where digital health and digital capitalism, and codes of research ethics and the lawlessness of the Internet economy, intersect.
I contend that the most pressing challenge at stake in this new model of research is less the question of individual privacy than the question of collective and societal welfare, and that existing governance frameworks that seek to increase individual control over data are ill-suited to address this. Commons- and solidarity-based approaches, which seek to enhance collective agency and control, are thus promising alternatives. However, these approaches allow for only one conception of the common good, while a plurality of competing conceptions are at work in GHR, including “increased efficiency”, “greater inclusivity”, and “economic growth”. This plurality must be taken seriously to avoid theory-practice discrepancies and to develop viable governance solutions.
The project will develop a normative framework that can both foreground collective benefit all the while accounting for this ethical plurality. To do this, my team will first map the different conceptions of the common good – or “moral repertoires” – that motivate actors in several GHR-type collaborations. Using an empirical-philosophical methodology, we will critically evaluate these repertoires and the value trade-offs they involve in practice. Next, we will explore the viability of commons- and solidarity-based approaches in light of this. Finally, these results will be integrated into a novel, empirically-robust normative framework that can offer guidance to research ethicists and policy makers.
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "DIGITAL GOOD" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "DIGITAL GOOD" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.
High-throughput single-cell phenotypic analysis of functional antibody repertoires
Read MoreWhy is the world green: testing top-down control of plant-herbivore food webs by experiments with birds, bats and ants
Read MoreSignaling dynamics in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation during development and homeostasis
Read More