FeedS First SIGNED
Feedback for Small Companies and Firsttimers (FeedS First)
Total Cost €
0EC-Contrib. €
0Partnership
0Views
0FeedS First project word cloud
Explore the words cloud of the FeedS First project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "FeedS First" about.
Project "FeedS First" data sheet
The following table provides information about the project.
| Coordinator |
OSTERREICHISCHE FORSCHUNGSFORDERUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Organization address contact info |
| Coordinator Country | Austria [AT] |
| Total cost | 60˙000 € |
| EC max contribution | 60˙000 € (100%) |
| Programme |
1. H2020-EU.2.3.2.2. (Enhancing the innovation capacity of SMEs) |
| Code Call | H2020-INNOSUP-2018-06-two-stage |
| Funding Scheme | CSA-LS |
| Starting year | 2019 |
| Duration (year-month-day) | from 2019-10-01 to 2022-03-31 |
Partnership
Take a look of project's partnership.
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OSTERREICHISCHE FORSCHUNGSFORDERUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH | AT (WIEN) | coordinator | 60˙000.00 |
Map
Project objective
The main objective of this project is to test the effects of feedback provided by FFG experts to R&D projects of small companies and first-timers funded in the “General Programme” of the FFG.
The “General Programme” (https://www.ffg.at/en/general-programme-further-information) of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) is the biggest and longest running R&D funding scheme in Austria.
The focus is on providing feedback for small companies and first timers in the FFG, which are funded in the “General Programme”. These types of companies are selected in this experiment because it was pre-assessed that in these cases feedback would be necessary. The feedback will be offered on the technical concept, the business plan and/or the written application. The effects of this feedback should be measured by the quality of the project execution, quality of future proposals and the success of the project outcomes and company.
So far feedback is only provided if the application is rejected. No feedback is given in case of a positive evaluation result. Only a contract is issued and sometimes there are conditions included in the contract (e.g. for financing statements). So, although these projects are classified as worth funding (à “good projects”) until now they do not receive any information on how to improve. This is what this INNOSUP-application intends to change: Give also feedback to the “good projects” in order to further improve the quality of the projects (e.g. in terms of technical issues or economic aspects) with the expectation that this feedback enhances business performance.
With this experiment FFG wants to test, if giving feedback for small enterprises and enterprises who apply the first time have positive effects on the quality of the project execution, quality of future proposals and the success of the project outcomes and company performance.
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "FEEDS FIRST" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "FEEDS FIRST" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.