Explore the words cloud of the UncertainENV project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "UncertainENV" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Israel [IL] |
Total cost | 1˙500˙000 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙500˙000 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2018-STG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-STG |
Starting year | 2019 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2019-10-01 to 2024-09-30 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY | IL (TEL AVIV) | coordinator | 1˙500˙000.00 |
Much of the research on the foundations of graph algorithms is carried out under the assumption that the algorithm has full knowledge of the input data. In spite of the theoretical appeal and simplicity of this setting, the assumption that the algorithm has full knowledge does not always hold. Indeed uncertainty and partial knowledge arise in many settings. One example is where the data is very large, in which case even reading the entire data once is infeasible, and sampling is required. Another example is where data changes occur over time (e.g., social networks where information is fluid). A third example is where processing of the data is distributed over computation nodes, and each node has only local information.
Randomization is a powerful tool in the classic setting of graph algorithms with full knowledge and is often used to simplify the algorithm and to speed-up its running time. However, physical computers are deterministic machines, and obtaining true randomness can be a hard task to achieve. Therefore, a central line of research is focused on the derandomization of algorithms that relies on randomness.
The challenge of derandomization also arise in settings where the algorithm has some degree of uncertainty. In fact, in many cases of uncertainty the challenge and motivation of derandomization is even stronger. Randomization by itself adds another layer of uncertainty, because different results may be attained in different runs of the algorithm. In addition, in many cases of uncertainty randomization often comes with additional assumptions on the model itself, and therefore weaken the guarantees of the algorithm.
In this proposal I will investigate the power of randomization in uncertain environments. I will focus on two fundamental areas of graph algorithms with uncertainty. The first area relates to dynamic algorithms and the second area concerns distributed graph algorithms.
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "UNCERTAINENV" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "UNCERTAINENV" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.