NEWSYN

Internalist vs externalist evolutionary biology: do we need a New Synthesis?

 Coordinatore THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER 

 Organization address address: OXFORD ROAD
city: MANCHESTER
postcode: M13 9PL

contact info
Titolo: Ms.
Nome: Liz
Cognome: Fay
Email: send email
Telefono: +44 161 275 7114
Fax: +44 161 275 2445

 Nazionalità Coordinatore United Kingdom [UK]
 Totale costo 230˙110 €
 EC contributo 230˙110 €
 Programma FP7-PEOPLE
Specific programme "People" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013)
 Code Call FP7-PEOPLE-2007-4-1-IOF
 Funding Scheme MC-IOF
 Anno di inizio 2009
 Periodo (anno-mese-giorno) 2009-02-23   -   2013-04-28

 Partecipanti

# participant  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER

 Organization address address: OXFORD ROAD
city: MANCHESTER
postcode: M13 9PL

contact info
Titolo: Ms.
Nome: Liz
Cognome: Fay
Email: send email
Telefono: +44 161 275 7114
Fax: +44 161 275 2445

UK (MANCHESTER) coordinator 0.00

Mappa


 Word cloud

Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.

philosophy    perspectives    shape    alternative    developmental    revealed    empirical    conceptual    chick    physical    certain    science    framework    induce    perspective    variation    evolutionary    skull    internalist    embryos    species    suggested    externalist    theory    evolution    newsyn    natural    evolved    beak   

 Obiettivo del progetto (Objective)

'The theory of evolution is fragmented by two different views of life: the externalist and the internalist perspective. From the formulation of the theory of natural selection by Darwin, in 1859, externalist view has dominated in evolutionary thought. In the last decades, internalist perspective has recovered vigour in the light of recent empirical advances in molecular genetics. An alternative theory is emerging. The major aim of this project is to contribute to the development of a common conceptual framework that will eventually facilitate a true integration of these century-old perspectives. We will reach the philosophy of science to analyse the conceptual framework of these evolutionary theories. Furthermore, in an effort to show the importance of the philosophy for science, the second principal goal consists to finding out exactly what is implied by the contrast between the two perspectives, as far as empirical claims are concerned.'

Introduzione (Teaser)

Development in many organisms uses a restricted set of physical processes to produce functionally and morphologically diverse features. How the dynamics of development have evolved to shape these phenotypes is yet to be determined.

Descrizione progetto (Article)

Exposure of chick embryos to certain teratogens can induce beak shape variation. This variation resembles that observed in nature, which evolved by natural selection and other processes. These observations indicate that internal factors have an important role in evolution necessitate alternative explanations for the developmental changes involved in such abrupt transitions of form.

In this context, scientists on the EU-funded 'Internalist vs externalist evolutionary biology: do we need a new synthesis?' (NEWSYN) project set out to study how developmental processes determine evolution experimentally.

They used beak development in the chick embryo as a model to analyse the transformations of the face in valproic acid-treated embryos. Morphometric analysis revealed that changes in face budding early in development precede the formation of a curved beak later on.

Work on the evolution of the skull shape in other bird species revealed that similar evolutionary patterns are seen in distantly related species with dissimilar lifestyles. This again suggested that the cause of their origination was not functional demand but rather the process of skull development.

Taken together, the NEWSYN experiments suggested that genes alone do not induce a particular phenotype. Rather they act indirectly to mobilise certain physical processes that produce a special characteristic. Evidence that evolution is driven by complex intrinsic changes and not just natural selection contributes to current debates concerning evolutionary theory.

Altri progetti dello stesso programma (FP7-PEOPLE)

EPPIC (2009)

Energetic Particle Precipitation Interconnection with Climate

Read More  

LUNG DCS UNFOLD (2011)

Involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response in lung dendritic cell function and inflammatory lung diseases

Read More  

NEUROBEECOG2012 (2014)

"Smart foraging: neuronal complexity, cognition and foraging in honey bees"

Read More