DEMOCRITOS aims to conduct studies on: 1. Detailed preliminary designs of ground experiments that will allow maturing the necessary technologies in the field of MW level nuclear electric propulsion. 2. conceptualize the concept of nuclear space reactor and outline the...
DEMOCRITOS aims to conduct studies on: 
1.	Detailed preliminary designs of ground experiments that will allow maturing the necessary technologies in the field of MW level nuclear electric propulsion. 
2.	conceptualize the concept of nuclear space reactor and outline the specifications for a Core Demonstrator, based on past studies, including an analysis of the regulatory and safety framework that will be necessary for such a demonstration to take place on the ground. 
3.	System architecture and robotic assembly sequences that will investigate in detail the overall design of a high power nuclear spacecraft (named INPPS - International Nuclear Power and Propulsion System -) , together with a pragmatic strategy for assembly in orbit of such a large structure coupled with a nuclear reactor. 
4. Programmatic aspects of an organisation that can undertake the experiments proposed in DEMOCRITOS Ground component. 
5. Forming a cluster around NEP related technologies by organising an international workshop
The project has reached its conclusion. The main results of the project are:
Ground Demonstrator (WP2 and WP3):
High Level design of a ground demonstrator, based upon the test bench of the Keldysh Research Center in Moscow. The designs include details and CAD files for conversion subsystem, power management subsystem, propulsion subsystem (cluster of two high power electric thrusters), thermal management subsystem and fluidic loop. The power provided comes from a conventional gas reactor with the ability to simulate the behavior or a nuclear core. A  suggestion of the ground demonstrator is that some studies on the behavior of electric thruster in clusters are needed to better understand possible issues that might arise. 
1. Thrusters can interact (electrical, thermal, magnetic interactions etc.) with each other, in a way that can modify/hinder their efficient operation; 
2. Thruster  plume  is  modified,  and  it  can  modify  the  interaction  between  the thrusters and the spacecraft; 
3. Performance of each thruster (thrust and other main parameters) may also be modified. 
KeRC existing electric propulsion test bench will allow testing cluster of thrusters  at  low  mass  flow  rate  modes  and  with  power  no  more  than  35  kW  (test bench modification of acceptable cost will be required). 
Core demonstrator (WP4):
Several studies were performed under WP4. The 1992 UN Principles Relevant to the Use  of  Nuclear  Power  Sources  in  Outer  Space  specifically  state  that  nuclear  power sources  for  propulsive  purposes  are  not  covered  in  the  principles.  This  will  require  a dialogue  with  the  UN  to  confirm  if  these  principles  should  be  applied  as  they  will influence aspects of the design.  It  was  concluded  that the  small  relative  power  and  the  overall  scientific  purpose  of  the  Core  Demonstrator places it in the category of a research reactor rather than a power reactor and justify the adoption of appropriate safety standards. Additional standards or safety measures may also be required due to the fast neutron spectrum and high temperature and pressure loops of the Core Demonstrator. This would require further investigation and would be subject to approval by the national regulatory body in the country of licensing. 
The suitability of other mature space reactor concepts for the DEMOCRITOS project was examined.    For  this  task,  two  existing  concepts  using  liquid  metal  and  gas  coolants  were chosen; the CEA  /CNES   OPUS   and the USSDI  /US-DOE  /NASA   SP-100 designs.  Several  standard  techniques  for upscaling/uprating each core design without a significant increase in volume and weight were given. An  overall  aim  for  the  DEMOCRITOS  project  is  to  increase  the  core  outlet  temperature from  1300  K  in  order  to  improve  thermal  efficiency  and  reduce  the  size  of  radiator required.  
The relative advantages and disadvantages of power conversion systems that are coupled, either directly or indirectly, to the primary circuit of a nuclear reactor for the generation of electricity in space were examined. The DEMOCRITOS project has decided to adopt a liquid metal cooled reactor, based on the review of reactor technologies as presented in Deliverable 4.2. This choice drives the selection of an indirect power conversion system. The indirect cycle offers advantages in terms of reduced complexity of turbomachinery, primary circuit cleanliness, terrestrial licensing, controllability and a potential system mass saving in space.   This reactor uses liquid lithium as the reactor primary coolant and a secondary gas coolant as the turbomachinery working fluid in an indirect Brayton power conversion system. 
Space Demonstrator (WP5)
The Concurrent Engineering (CE) workshop for DEMOCRITOS took place from the 12thto the 16th  of September 2016 in the CE Facility (CEF) of DLR Bremen. The study was performed by domain experts of the consortium partners which includ
The project was a coordination and support action with the aim to create an international network around NEP and successful channels have been established in Europe, Russia, US , Japan and Brazil. 
Due to the enormity of the undertaking of a 1MW nuclear spacecraft, it is judged that only in the decade 2030-2040 would such a spacecraft be feasible and it should be the next ISS endeavor is space on behalf of humanity.  The six benefits of nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) Icompared to chemical powered rockets to MARS and deep space destinations:  
 1)  shorter travel time,  
2)  an order of magnitude higher payload mass, 
3)  relative low mass for the spacecraft to be transported into high Earth orbit (for equivalent capabilities with traditional propulsion means),  
4)  especially for missions after the first one, only additional electric thruster fuel  and new payload have to be added,      
5)  long term cost reduction, because of re-usability of INPPS and 
6)  disruptive space technology / transportation program realization with only initial higher technology development costs than chemical space transportation in 
general.
More info: http://www.h2020-democritos.eu/.