Coordinatore | STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT BRABANT UNIVERSITEIT VAN TILBURG
Organization address
address: Warandelaan 2 contact info |
Nazionalità Coordinatore | Netherlands [NL] |
Totale costo | 150˙135 € |
EC contributo | 150˙135 € |
Programma | FP7-PEOPLE
Specific programme "People" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) |
Code Call | FP7-PEOPLE-2007-2-1-IEF |
Funding Scheme | MC-IEF |
Anno di inizio | 2008 |
Periodo (anno-mese-giorno) | 2008-08-01 - 2010-07-31 |
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT BRABANT UNIVERSITEIT VAN TILBURG
Organization address
address: Warandelaan 2 contact info |
NL (TILBURG) | coordinator | 0.00 |
Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.
'People all over the world feel unhappy or even depressed when their explicit goals are incongruent with their implicit needs. This discrepancy plays a crucial role especially during stressful life events that are typical for immigrants. The aim of our research project is to go beyond previous studies on acculturation and well-being by assessing potential discrepancies between explicit goals and implicit motives as 'hidden stressors' in the acculturation process of Turkish first- and second-generation immigrants. We draw upon recent findings in the areas of motivation, acculturation and identity to construct a model about immigrants’ subjective well-being. We propose that well-being is influenced by the alignment of implicit motives and explicit goals, which reflect relations between the private and public domain in acculturation. This relationship is mediated by the interaction of an individual’s acculturation orientation and identity status. Our research design consists of three studies that employ state-of-the-art methodology, including a multi-method approach, and a cross-sectional study, and a longitudinal study using cultural frame switching: We first test the general model (Study 1). Then, we experimentally investigate immigrants’ well-being in different cultural contexts (i.e., host culture/culture of origin; Study 2). Finally, we examine differences in well-being in varying cultural contexts within each person (Study 3). Our approach goes beyond self-reports and can shed light on why some acculturation strategies level may not work equally well for all individuals. Improving psychological assessment and counselling, our framework can build a basis for social intervention programs by shifting the focus to interindividual differences in immigrants so that steps, based on the individual case, can be taken to facilitate an individual’s endeavour of becoming a happy and adapted member of society.'
It is not easy to measure the well-being of immigrants against their true desires to integrate into their host country. A new approach using a more implicit line of questioning has the potential to clarify the picture.
The process of absorbing the culture of another society, i.e. acculturation, plays a crucial role in the well-being of immigrants when they move to their new host country. Research has revealed that when people's goals are not in line with their implicit needs, they become depressed and emotionally distressed. This holds especially true for immigrants moving to a new country, a phenomenon studied by the EU-funded project 'Pursuing goals you really want: Motive congruence and well-being in Turkish immigrants' (Acculturation).
Project researchers looked at the Turkish example in the Netherlands, examining the role of identity as a determinant of well-being. It explored how this immigrant group aligns commitment to its original culture with its desire or need for acculturation in the new host country. In this context, unhappiness and homesickness were probed to shed light on acculturation and hopefully ease immigrant integration in the long run.
Surveying 134 Turkish-Dutch individuals, the project team evaluated their implicit drives to understand their explicit motivation. This would allow the team to pinpoint acculturation level on a fixed scale. The approach involved several indicators on subjective well-being, documenting implicit and explicit affiliation, achieved identity, adaptation and cognitive well-being.
From this analysis, the team concluded that individuals who establish their identity by aligning explicit goals and implicit desires to adapt to the host culture may suffer. It found that an already strong sense of identity was more difficult to shape, revealing that other approaches might be more promising for immigrants to adapt to the host country.
This first ever study to including implicit measures in measuring acculturation showed that an alignment of motives, be they implicit or explicit, is an important yet neglected predictor of well-being. A study of immigrant well-being that takes these factors into consideration would almost certainly be more accurate in its assessments.