Explore the words cloud of the K4U project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "K4U" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | United Kingdom [UK] |
Project website | https://www.dur.ac.uk/k4u/ |
Total cost | 2˙092˙125 € |
EC max contribution | 2˙092˙125 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2014-ADG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-ADG |
Starting year | 2015 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2015-11-01 to 2021-10-31 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM | UK (DURHAM) | coordinator | 1˙797˙800.00 |
2 | LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE | UK (LONDON) | participant | 264˙835.00 |
3 | UNIVERSITA CA' FOSCARI VENEZIA | IT (VENEZIA) | participant | 29˙490.00 |
‘Research is an investment in our future’ says Horizon 2020. That’s only true if you know what to do with it. When it comes to social policy, we don’t really know how to put our research results to use. K4U aims to remedy this. K4U will construct a radically new picture of how to use social science to build better social policies. This picture will be founded on an ambitious philosophical study of the technology of social science including a thorough reconceptualisation of objectivity, deliberation and the role of values in the science/society interface. Current work, primarily by the evidence-based policy and practice movement, focusses on knowledge production: encouraging high quality studies and vetting them. Little attention goes to knowledge use: How is social science knowledge to be used in policy design and deliberation – how should it be used so that policy outcomes are more effective and more reliably predictable and competing values and points of view are respected in policy choice and implementation? K4U will provide not just a theoretical but a practical understanding— for users: intelligible and practically helpful to those who need to estimate and balance the effectiveness, the evidence, the chances of success, the costs, the benefits, the winners and losers, and the social, moral, political and cultural acceptability of proposed policies. The philosophical approach of K4U is broadly Popperian. It views ‘science and technology as a means of understanding social problems and responding to them’ and it emphasises the concrete and detailed, where the real content of general philosophical concepts and claims is embodied and interrogated. K4U is a showcase for the kind of philosophy that makes a difference to real life -- philosophy for practice. And it will launch an entire new field in philosophy: the philosophy of social technology.
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2016 |
Nancy Cartwright Contingency and the order of nature published pages: 56-63, ISSN: 1369-8486, DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.008 |
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58 | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Julian Reiss Against external validity published pages: , ISSN: 0039-7857, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-1796-6 |
Synthese | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Linda McKie, Marjut Jyrkinen MyManagement: women managers in gendered and sexualised workplaces published pages: 98-110, ISSN: 1754-2413, DOI: 10.1108/GM-04-2016-0091 |
Gender in Management: An International Journal 32/2 | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Anna Marmodoro Dispositional Modality Vis-Ã -Vis Conditional Necessity published pages: 205-214, ISSN: 0190-0536, DOI: 10.1111/phin.12125 |
Philosophical Investigations 39/3 | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Angus Deaton, Nancy Cartwright The limitations of randomised controlled trials published pages: , ISSN: , DOI: |
2020-03-20 | |
2018 |
Davey, C., Hargreaves, J., Hassan, S., Cartwright, N., Gough, D., Humphreys, M., Masset, E., Oliver, S., Prost, A., Bonell, C. Designing evaluations to provide evidence to inform action in new settings published pages: , ISSN: , DOI: |
The Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL) Inception Papers | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Nancy Cartwright Loose Talk Kills: What’s Worrying about Unity of Method published pages: 768-778, ISSN: 0031-8248, DOI: 10.1086/687862 |
Philosophy of Science 83/5 | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Kathryn E Joyce, Nancy Cartwright Meeting our standards for educational justice: Doing our best with the evidence published pages: 3-22, ISSN: 1477-8785, DOI: 10.1177/1477878518756565 |
Theory and Research in Education 16/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Nancy Cartwright Theoretical practices that work: those that mimic Nature’s own published pages: 165, ISSN: 1913-0465, DOI: 10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27045 |
Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 9/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Anna Marmodoro, Ben Page Aquinas on Forms, Substances and Artifacts published pages: 1-21, ISSN: 0042-7543, DOI: 10.1163/15685349-12341310 |
Vivarium 54/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Julian Reiss Suppes’ probabilistic theory of causality and causal inference in economics published pages: 289-304, ISSN: 1350-178X, DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2016.1189127 |
Journal of Economic Methodology 23/3 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Nancy Cartwright, Jeremy Hardie Predicting What Will Happen When You Intervene published pages: 270-279, ISSN: 0091-1674, DOI: 10.1007/s10615-016-0615-0 |
Clinical Social Work Journal 45/3 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Julian Reiss Fact-value entanglement in positive economics published pages: 134-149, ISSN: 1350-178X, DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2017.1309749 |
Journal of Economic Methodology 24/2 | 2020-03-20 |
2015 |
Nancy Cartwright The Dewey Lecture 2015: Get on Board. published pages: , ISSN: , DOI: |
Proceedings and Adressess of the APA | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Nancy Cartwright Big Systems Versus Stocky Tangles: It Can Matter to the Details published pages: 3-19, ISSN: 0165-0106, DOI: 10.1007/s10670-016-9869-8 |
Erkenntnis 83/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Oliver, S., Gough, D., Stewart, R., Dickson, K., Bangpan, M., Pells, K., Hargreaves, J., Cartwright, N., Roche, C. Stakeholder engagement for development impact and learning published pages: , ISSN: , DOI: |
The Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL) Inception Papers | 2020-03-20 |
2015 |
Nancy Cartwright Where’s the Rigor When You Need It? published pages: 106-124, ISSN: 1554-0642, DOI: 10.1561/1400000045 |
Foundations and Trends® in Accounting 10/2-4 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Nick Cowen, Baljinder Virk, Stella Mascarenhas-Keyes, Nancy Cartwright Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works� published pages: 265-292, ISSN: 0891-3811, DOI: 10.1080/08913811.2017.1395223 |
Critical Review 29/3 | 2020-03-20 |
2018 |
Wendy S. Parker, Eric Winsberg Values and evidence: how models make a difference published pages: 125-142, ISSN: 1879-4912, DOI: 10.1007/s13194-017-0180-6 |
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Eleonora Montuschi There Is “Noise,†and Noise published pages: 204-225, ISSN: 1063-6145, DOI: 10.1162/POSC_a_00241 |
Perspectives on Science 25/2 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Eleonora Montuschi ‘Oggettività e disaccordo: il ruolo degli esperti scientifici nelle decisioni di policy’ published pages: vol. 219, pp. 1-, ISSN: 2035-5866, DOI: 10.23827/BDL_2017_2_1 |
Biblioteca della libertà | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Louise Caffrey, Eileen Munro A systems approach to policy evaluation published pages: 463-478, ISSN: 1356-3890, DOI: 10.1177/1356389017730727 |
Evaluation 23/4 | 2020-03-20 |
2016 |
Nancy Cartwright, John Bryan Davis Economics as Science published pages: 43-55, ISSN: , DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-58017-7_4 |
2020-03-20 | |
2017 |
Angus Deaton, Nancy Cartwright Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials published pages: , ISSN: 0277-9536, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005 |
Social Science & Medicine | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Patrick Bateson, Nancy Cartwright, John Dupré, Kevin Laland, Denis Noble New trends in evolutionary biology: biological, philosophical and social science perspectives published pages: 20170051, ISSN: 2042-8898, DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0051 |
Interface Focus 7/5 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam, Nancy Cartwright What’s so special about empirical adequacy? published pages: 445-465, ISSN: 1879-4912, DOI: 10.1007/s13194-017-0171-7 |
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7/3 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Anna Marmodoro Stoic Blends
 published pages: 1-24, ISSN: 1059-986X, DOI: 10.1163/22134417-00321P02 |
Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 32/1 | 2020-03-20 |
2017 |
Eleonora Montuschi Using science, making policy: what should we worry about? published pages: 57-78, ISSN: 1879-4912, DOI: 10.1007/s13194-016-0143-3 |
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7/1 | 2020-03-20 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "K4U" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "K4U" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.