Explore the words cloud of the CUREORCURSE project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "CUREORCURSE" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
UNIVERSITE LIBRE DE BRUXELLES
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Belgium [BE] |
Total cost | 1˙981˙589 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙981˙589 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2017-COG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-COG |
Starting year | 2018 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2018-09-01 to 2023-08-31 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | UNIVERSITE LIBRE DE BRUXELLES | BE (BRUXELLES) | coordinator | 1˙981˙589.00 |
Evidence of a growing disengagement of citizens from politics is multiplying. Electoral turnout reaches historically low levels. Anti-establishment and populist parties are on the rise. Fewer and fewer Europeans trust their representative institutions. In response, we have observed a multiplication of institutional reforms aimed at revitalizing representative democracy. Two in particular stand out: the delegation of some political decision-making powers to (1) selected citizens and to (2) selected experts. But there is a paradox in attempting to cure the crisis of representative democracy by introducing such reforms. In representative democracy, control over political decision-making is vested in elected representatives. Delegating political decision-making to selected experts/citizens is at odds with this definition. It empowers the non-elected. If these reforms show that politics could work without elected officials, could we really expect that citizens’ support for representative democracy would be boosted and that citizens would re-engage with representative politics? In that sense, would it be a cure for the crisis of representative democracy, or rather a curse? Our central hypothesis is that there is no universal and univocal healing (or harming) effect of non-elected politics on support for representative democracy. In order to verify it, I propose to collect data across Europe on three elements: (1) a detailed study of the preferences of Europeans on how democracy should work and on institutional reforms towards non-elected politics, (2) a comprehensive inventory of all actual cases of empowerment of citizens and experts implemented across Europe since 2000, and (3) an analysis of the impact of exposure to non-elected politics on citizens’ attitudes towards representative democracy. An innovative combination of online survey experiments and of panel surveys will be used to answer this topical research question with far-reaching societal implication.
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2020 |
Camille Bedock, Jean-Benoit Pilet Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens published pages: 1-20, ISSN: 0017-257X, DOI: 10.1017/gov.2020.1 |
Government and Opposition | 2020-04-07 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "CUREORCURSE" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "CUREORCURSE" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.
HighlY performing proton exchange membrane water electrolysers with reinforceD membRanes fOr efficient hydrogen GENeration
Read More