ECONENDLIFE
The economic evaluation of end of life care
| Coordinatore | THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM
Spiacenti, non ci sono informazioni su questo coordinatore. Contattare Fabio per maggiori infomrazioni, grazie. |
| Nazionalità Coordinatore | United Kingdom [UK] |
| Totale costo | 999˙177 € |
| EC contributo | 999˙177 € |
| Programma | FP7-IDEAS-ERC
Specific programme: "Ideas" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) |
| Code Call | ERC-2010-StG_20091118 |
| Funding Scheme | ERC-SG |
| Anno di inizio | 2011 |
| Periodo (anno-mese-giorno) | 2011-04-01 - 2015-09-30 |
Partecipanti
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM
Organization address
address: Edgbaston contact info |
UK (BIRMINGHAM) | hostInstitution | 999˙177.00 |
| 2 |
THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM
Organization address
address: Edgbaston contact info |
UK (BIRMINGHAM) | hostInstitution | 999˙177.00 |
Mappa
Word cloud
Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.
Obiettivo del progetto (Objective)
'Making choices about the health care that we provide in society is a fundamental and unavoidable issue. Economic evaluation aids this decision-making by supplying information about costs and benefits of different interventions. For end of life care, however, current evaluative frameworks are inadequate because they focus only on health and only on the patient. Amartya Sen’s capability approach offers an alternative and appropriate framework for evaluating end of life care and this programme aims to build on my ground-breaking work in the application of Sen’s approach to measurement within economic evaluation. Six key tasks will be undertaken: (i) defining the ‘end of life’ period using semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders; (ii) assessing the construct validity and sensitivity to change of a descriptive system for evaluating capabilities related to end of life care; (iii) eliciting values for this descriptive system from the general public and patients at the end of life using the best-worst scaling technique; (iv) developing a descriptive system to evaluate the impact on families’ capabilities of end of life care, using in-depth interviews to develop conceptual attributes; (v) conducting exploratory theoretical and methodological work on weighting across measures; and (vi) exploring views of the public and key stakeholders about appropriate decision-rules for end of life care, using a combination of focus groups and in-depth interviews. The work involves frontier research at the interface between health, economics and human development. It will address the significant methodological issues associated with the economic evaluation of end of life care and so advance the state-of-the-art to a point where robust economic evaluation of end of life care is feasible.'