Explore the words cloud of the JUDI-ARCH project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "JUDI-ARCH" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
Coordinator |
Masarykova univerzita
Organization address contact info |
Coordinator Country | Czech Republic [CZ] |
Project website | http://judicialstudiesinstitute.com/content/en/judi-arch/o-projektu/ |
Total cost | 1˙499˙625 € |
EC max contribution | 1˙499˙625 € (100%) |
Programme |
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)) |
Code Call | ERC-2015-STG |
Funding Scheme | ERC-STG |
Starting year | 2016 |
Duration (year-month-day) | from 2016-09-01 to 2021-08-31 |
Take a look of project's partnership.
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Masarykova univerzita | CZ (BRNO STRED) | coordinator | 1˙499˙625.00 |
Many European states have transferred decision-making powers regarding court administration and the career of a judge from political bodies to special organs in which judges have a major say. Judicial councils and other bodies of judicial self-government (JSG) spread particularly quickly during the European Union (EU) Accession Process. However, the effects of these bodies are not fully understood, as the traditional descriptive and normative scholarship is not able to capture them. JUDI-ARCH will fill this gap and address the implications of this phenomenon for the “new” as well as “old” EU member states. The central research question of JUDI-ARCH is: how the rise of JSG has changed the concept of separation of powers? More specifically, the JUDI-ARCH proposal consists of three interrelated research aims. The first is to assess the impact of JSG on public confidence in and the independence, accountability, transparency and legitimacy of the domestic judiciaries of 14 European states and the two European supranational courts, both the actual and the perceived. The second aim is to examine what impact the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) have had on domestic judicial design and, vice versa, how has domestic judicial design affected the selection of judges of the ECtHR and the CJEU. The third overarching aim is to analyse the impact of JSG on the concept of separation of powers. A major innovation in our approach will be the integration of comparative legal perspective with sociological and political science approaches. We will conduct in-depth conceptual, qualitative and quantitative case studies on the impact of different models of JSG in both “new” and “old” EU Member States, including longitudinal quantitative analysis of the use of mechanisms of judicial independence and accountability before and after the creation of a JSG body and in-depth elite interviews.
year | authors and title | journal | last update |
---|---|---|---|
2018 |
Shai Dothan The Motivations of Individual Judges and How They Act as a Group published pages: 2165-2188, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023361 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-07-08 |
2018 |
Nino Tsereteli, Hubert Smekal The Judicial Self-Government at the International Level — A New Research Agenda published pages: 2137-2164, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s207183220002335x |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-07-08 |
2018 |
Samuel SpÃ¡Ä Recruiting European Judges in the Age of Judicial Self-Government published pages: 2077-2104, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023336 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Adam Blisa, David KosaÅ™ Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Judicial Governance published pages: 2031-2076, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023324 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Matej Avbelj Contextual Analysis of Judicial Governance in Slovenia published pages: 1901-1930, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023270 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Jan Petrov Unpacking the partnership: typology of constitutional courts’ roles in implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ case law published pages: 499-531, ISSN: 1574-0196, DOI: 10.1017/s1574019618000299 |
European Constitutional Law Review 14/3 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
MarÃna Urbániková, KatarÃna Å ipulová Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts? published pages: 2105-2136, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023348 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Antoine Vauchez The Strange Non-Death of Statism: Tracing the Ever Protracted Rise of Judicial Self-Government in France published pages: 1613-1640, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s207183220002318x |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Patrick O\'Brien Never let a Crisis go to Waste: Politics, Personality and Judicial Self-Government in Ireland published pages: 1871-1900, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023269 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Bianca Selejan-Gut̗an Romania: Perils of a “Perfect Euro-Model†of Judicial Council published pages: 1707-1740, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s207183220002321x |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Fabian Wittreck German Judicial Self-Government — Institutions and Constraints published pages: 1931-1950, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023282 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
David KosaÅ™ Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self-Governance in Europe published pages: 1567-1612, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023178 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Aida Torres Pérez Judicial Self-Government and Judicial Independence: the Political Capture of the General Council of the Judiciary in Spain published pages: 1769-1800, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023233 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Başak Çalı, Betül Durmuş Judicial Self-Government as Experimental Constitutional Politics: The Case of Turkey published pages: 1671-1706, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023208 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Adam Blisa, Tereza PapouÅ¡ková, MarÃna Urbániková Judicial Self-Government in Czechia: Europe\'s Black Sheep? published pages: 1951-1976, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023294 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2017 |
David KosaÅ™ Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability in Czechia: Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law between Court Presidents and the Ministry of Justice published pages: 96-123, ISSN: 1574-0196, DOI: 10.1017/s1574019616000419 |
European Constitutional Law Review 13/1 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
David KosaÅ™, KatarÃna Å ipulová The Strasbourg Court Meets Abusive Constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the Rule of Law published pages: 83-110, ISSN: 1876-4045, DOI: 10.1007/s40803-017-0065-y |
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 10/1 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Simone Benvenuti The Politics of Judicial Accountability in Italy: Shifting the Balance published pages: 369-393, ISSN: 1574-0196, DOI: 10.1017/s1574019618000214 |
European Constitutional Law Review 14/2 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Samuel SpáÄ, KatarÃna Å ipulová, MarÃna Urbániková Capturing the Judiciary from Inside: The Story of Judicial Self-Governance in Slovakia published pages: 1741-1768, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023221 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Jan Petrov The Populist Challenge to the European Court of Human Rights published pages: , ISSN: 2161-0320, DOI: |
The Jean Monnet Working Paper Series Jean Monnet Working Paper 3/18 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Anna Śledzińska-Simon The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Government in Poland: On Judicial Reform Reversing Democratic Transition published pages: 1839-1870, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023257 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Simone Benvenuti, Davide Paris Judicial Self-Government in Italy: Merits, Limits and the Reality of an Export Model published pages: 1641-1670, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023191 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Elaine Mak Judicial Self Government in the Netherlands: Demarcating Autonomy published pages: 1801-1838, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023245 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
2018 |
Başak Çalı, Stewart Cunningham Judicial Self Government and the Sui Generis Case of the European Court of Human Rights published pages: 1977-2006, ISSN: 2071-8322, DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200023300 |
German Law Journal 19/7 | 2019-05-27 |
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "JUDI-ARCH" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "JUDI-ARCH" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.
A need for speed: mechanisms to coordinate protein synthesis and folding in metazoans
Read MoreJust because we can, should we? An anthropological perspective on the initiation of technology dependence to sustain a child’s life
Read MoreUnderstanding how mitochondria compete with Toxoplasma for nutrients to defend the host cell
Read More