Coordinatore | STICHTING DIENST LANDBOUWKUNDIG ONDERZOEK
Organization address
address: Costerweg 50 contact info |
Nazionalità Coordinatore | Netherlands [NL] |
Sito del progetto | http://www.econwelfare.eu/ |
Totale costo | 1˙308˙765 € |
EC contributo | 998˙554 € |
Programma | FP7-KBBE
Specific Programme "Cooperation": Food, Agriculture and Biotechnology |
Code Call | FP7-KBBE-2007-1 |
Funding Scheme | CSA-SA |
Anno di inizio | 2008 |
Periodo (anno-mese-giorno) | 2008-08-01 - 2011-07-31 |
# | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
STICHTING DIENST LANDBOUWKUNDIG ONDERZOEK
Organization address
address: Costerweg 50 contact info |
NL (WAGENINGEN) | coordinator | 0.00 |
2 |
CENTRO RICERCHE PRODUZIONI ANIMALI - C.R.P.A. S.P.A.
Organization address
address: CORSO GARIBALDI 42 contact info |
IT (REGGIO EMILIA) | participant | 0.00 |
3 |
FORSCHUNGSINSTITUT FUR BIOLOGISCHENLANDBAU STIFTUNG
Organization address
address: ACKERSTRASSE POSTFACH 1 contact info |
CH (Frick) | participant | 0.00 |
4 |
SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET
Organization address
address: ARRHENIUSPLAN 4 contact info |
SE (UPPSALA) | participant | 0.00 |
5 |
SZKOLA GLOWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO
Organization address
address: Nowoursynowska 166 contact info |
PL (WARSZAWA) | participant | 0.00 |
6 |
UNIVERSIDAD DE EXTREMADURA
Organization address
address: AVENIDA DE ELVAS S/N contact info |
ES (BADAJOZ) | participant | 0.00 |
7 |
UNIVERSITET SV KIRIL I METODII VO SKOPJE VETERINAREN FAKULTET
Organization address
address: LAZAR POP TRAJKOV 5/7 contact info |
MK (SKOPJE) | participant | 0.00 |
8 |
UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE
Organization address
address: Kensington Terrace 6 contact info |
UK (NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE) | participant | 0.00 |
Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.
'The project proposal has been prepared in response to the call KBBE-2007-1-4-15 “Assessing the socio-economic consequences and costs benefits of measures promoting good animal welfare”. Central in this call is support to develop European policies implementing the Action Plan on Animal Welfare. Overall objective of the project is related to the policy instruments needed to achieve the aims of the Action Plan on Animal Welfare. At the end of the project we want to say what policy instruments are effective in the route towards higher animal welfare representing the concerns of civil society and in which competitiveness of the livestock industry is guaranteed. Basic questions in relation to objective 1. What are the current welfare initiatives and standards within the EU and its trade partners? 2. What are strength and weaknesses of these initiatives and standards to the animal, society and the production chain? 3. What policy instruments can be designed to promote high(er) animal welfare standards as aimed at in the Action Plan on Animal Welfare, and how can progress be monitored? 4. What are the benefits, costs and trade impacts of upgraded welfare standards? Activities in relation to objective - Communicate and debate to realize interaction across scientists, relevant stakeholders and citizens - Review and analyse current state of animal welfare in selected EU states and third countries - Examine strength and weaknesses in the current animal welfare standards to opinion of animal scientists, the supply chain, and consumers and citizens - Perform a SWOT-analysis on approaches for upgraded animal welfare - Brainstorm on strategic options for the EU to implement the Action Plan on Animal Welfare - Assesses costs and benefits when approaches and policies are introduced within the production chain - Perform macro-economic analysis of the competitiveness of European agricultural sectors and the impact on world trade - Organise a concluding workshop'
EU researchers have made recommendations on how to develop policies for improving animal well-being in Europe. Such policies should enhance the welfare of livestock while raising standards down on the farm.
Animal welfare is an important concern across the European Union. However, although Europeans consider that standards have been improved, most of them think that further improvements are necessary. With this in mind, the EU-funded EconWelfare project was set up to provide suggestions for national and European policymakers. Together with stakeholder groups, the project aimed to collect and investigate policy options and their likely impacts.
The EconWelfare project has yielded a large number of results.The main project conclusion is that although the overall goal of animal welfare policy should be the same everywhere in the EU, it is unlikely to be achieved in similar ways, with equal speed and at the same time everywhere in the EU. This is due to differences in e.g. level of legislation, price competition, awareness of citizens and consumers, etc. But in addition to tailor-made solutions, there are also important EU wide policy options.
For example, EU wide legislation is important to set the lower boundaries for farm animal welfare, but these need to be enforced. Secondly, at farm level, there is a potential for improving both animal welfare and production efficiency, either by improving e.g. handling practices or adopting best practices. Thirdly, that the most successful existing welfare enhancing initiatives combine multiple goals with the use of multiple policy instruments and are developed in cooperation by multiple actors. Fourthly, that more transparency towards consumers and business-to-business is needed on animal welfare issues.
For impact, EconWelfare recommends the monitoring of animal welfare developments over time in Member States by a restricted set of animal-based indicators, as well as indicators at supply chain, society and institutional level. It also makes recommendations towards a European Network of Reference Centres (ENRC), which could support Member States and stakeholders in the different stages of animal welfare policy development.
Practical implementation of precision livestock technologies and services at European pig farms using the living lab methodology
Read MoreImpact of climate change and globalisation on safety of fresh produce – governing a supply chain of uncompromised food sovereignty
Read More